ქართ | Eng

ISSN 2449-2396 (Print) | E ISSN 2449-2612 (Online)

THE IMPACT OF STRATEGIC PLANNING ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE - THROUGH STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

Author: TORNIKE KHOSHTARIA | Published: 2018-06-25 | Pages: 84-89

Full Text

Abstract

Actuality of the research. Strategic management is a key factor of the success of any organization. At what degree managers pay attention to strategy formulation and its implementation is reflected on a company performance. The worldwide experience shows that successful companies have clearly formulated strategic choice so they reach set goals step by step. In this way, they get desired results at local or international levels.

Theoretical basis of the work. Literature analysis showed that the main field of interest of strategic management is to answer the following question – what causes performance heterogeneity between competitor organizations? (Rum-melt, 1994). According to the existing point of view, hetero-geneity in the performance indicators can be explained by the strategic planning process, strategy formulation and the degree of the planning strategy implementation (Minzberg, 1990; Parnell, 1997). Therefore, the impact of the above mentioned three factors on organizational performance is discussed in the following research. The organizational re-sults are measured with two mechanisms – the “Objective fulfillment” and “Relative competitive performance”. The objective fulfillment shows how an organization manages to reach its outlined short-term or long-term goals while “Rel-ative competitive performance” shows the degree of im-provement or worsening of company’s performance accord-ing to sales, profit, market share, etc.

Scientific novelty of the work. It is estimated, that the manufacturing companies’ in Georgia, which are focused on a rational and comprehensive strategic planning have better results than those putting less emphasis on strategic planning. Also, it is empirically proved, that the companies adopting rational and comprehensive strategic planning in Georgia do not focus on the degree of planning of strategy implementation.

Practical value of the work. Research results are important not only for those studying strategic management issues but for the managers of running enterprises in Georgia who try to succeed on a competitive market through the strategic planning process. The given study will help managers to identify impeding factors in making a strategic choice and overcome difficulties arising in this process.


Keywords

BUSINESS STRATEGY, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION, ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE


References

  1. Armstrong, J. S., (1982). “The Value of Formal Planning for Strategic Decisions”. Review ofEmpirical Research’. Strategic Management Journal, 3(3), pp. 197-211.
  2. Boyd, B. K., (1991). “Strategic planning and financial performance: a meta-analytic review”.Journal of Management Studies, 28(4), pp. 353-374.
  3. Boyd, B. K. and Reuning-Elliott, E. (1998). “A Measurement Model of strategic Planning”.strategic Management Journal, 19(2), pp. 181-194.
  4. Cronbach, L. J., (1951).“Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests”.Psychometrika, 16. Pp. 297-334.
  5. Hickson, D. J., Miller, S. J. & Wilson, D. C., (2003). “Planned or Prioritized? Two Options inManaging the Implementation of strategic Decisions”.Journal of Management Studies, 40(7),pp. 1803-1836.
  6. Khoshtaria T, (2016)“Strategic Processes in Georgian ManufacturingCompanies – Business-Level Strategy Perspective” Administration and Management, N109, pp. 47-79.
  7. Mintzberg, H.,(1990). “Strategy formation: schools of thought”, chapter 5 in J.W. Fredrickson.
  8. Nandakumar, M.K., Ghobadian, A. and O’Regan, N., (2011). “Generic strategies and performance – evidence from manufacturing firms”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 60 Iss. 3 pp. 222 – 251. Noble, C. H. &Mokwa, M. P., (1999). “Implementing Marketing Strategies: Developing and Testing a Managerial Theory”. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), pp. 57-73.
  9. Parnell, J. A., (1997). “New Evidence in the Generic Strategy and Business Performance Debate: A Research Note”.British Journal of Management, 8(2), pp. 175-181.
  10. Pearce, J., II, Friedman, D. and Robinson, Jr., R., (1987). “The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance”.Strategic Management Journal, 8, pp. 125-134.
  11. Ramanujam, V. and Venkatraman, N., (1987). “Planning system characteristics and planning effectiveness”.Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), pp. 453-468.
  12. Ramanujam, V., Venkatraman, N. and Camillus, J. C., (1986).“Multi-Objective Assessment of Effectiveness of strategic Planning: A Discriminant Analysis Approach”.Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), pp.347-372.
  13. Richard, S. and Helms, M., (2006).”Linking strategic practices and organizational performance to Porter’s generic strategies”. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12 Iss 4 pp. 433 – 454.
  14. Rumelt, R.P., (1994). Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Salant, P. &Dillman, D. (1994). How to Conduci Your Own Survey. New York: John Wile.
  15. Steiner, G. A., (1979). “Strategic Planning: What Every Manager Must Know”. New York: The Free Press.

Globalization & Business European University European University European University mes.gov.ge erih plus mes.gov.ge EBSCO index copernicus Google Scholar Crossref Open Academic Journals Index Scientific Indexing Services International Scientific Indexing Daugavpils University