ქართ | Eng

ISSN 2449-2396 (ბეჭდური) | E ISSN 2449-2612 (ონლაინ)

JEL Classifications: I21; F69; O34


PREPARING SCHOOL GRADUATES TO INTEGRATE INTO THE WORLD OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGES, AND GLOBALIZATION: THE ROLE OF TEACHING TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING

Author: Moshe Barak | Published: 2019-07-29 | Pages: 16-23

Full Text


For Citation: Barak M. (2019), Preparing School Graduates To Integrate Into The World Of Technological Innovation, Social And Economic Changes, And Globalization: The Role Of Teaching Technology And Engineering, Globalization And Business, N7, pp. 16-23.

Abstract

Technological innovation, social and economic changes, and globalization are forcing the education system to prepare school graduates to integrate successfully into the rapidly changing world. Along with teaching basic subjects such as the humanities, languages, mathematics and science, schools should expose all students to new technologies, impart knowledge and skills to them to use these technologies effectively, and foster their motivation to integrate into the world of research and innovation in technology and engineering. Schools need also to prepare students to integrate into a world in which the vast majority of business organizations are not bureaucratic but rely instead on work teams, shared decision making and a great deal of risk-taking in the effort to compete in the global market. One of the main tools available to schools to achieve these goals is the teaching of subjects in technology and engineering as an integral part of the curriculum from kindergarten to high school. One challenge for technological education worldwide is to change what we have been teaching in the technological class. While in the past, technology education dealt with teaching subjects such as crafts, auto-mechanics or electronics, technology studies today have to focus more on developing students’ computational thinking, for example, in the context of computerized control systems and robotics. A second challenge to technological education today is to change how we teach in the technological classroom. We must move from the traditional chalk-and-board teaching method to teaching that develops students’ learning skills, for example, project-based learning. In this article, I will elaborate on these issues and present examples of the implementation of these ideas in the Israeli education system.


Keywords

COMPUTATIONAL THINKING, PROJECT-BASED LEARNING, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION


References

  1. Barak, M. & Asad, K. (2012). Teaching image processing concepts in junior high school: boys’ and girls’ achievements and attitudes towards technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 30(1), 81-105.
  2. Barak, M. (2018). Teaching electronics: from building circuits to system thinking and programming. In: M. De Vries (Ed.), Handbook of Technology Education, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 337-360.
  3. Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy – Practice, Problem solving, and Projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121-144, doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9.
  4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
  5. Dolmans, D. M., de Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. P., & van der Vleuten, C. M. (2005). Current perspectives: problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732-741.
  6. Hacker, M. (2017). Integrating computational thinking into technology and engineering education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(4), 8-14.
  7. Heinrich, E., Bhattacharya, M., & Rayudu, R. (2007). Preparation for lifelong learning using ePortfolios. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 653–663. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bgu.ac.il/10.1080/03043790701520602
  8. Hmelo-Silver C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark 2006. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
  9. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
  10. Hushman C. J., & Marley S. C. (2015). Guided instruction improves elementary student learning and self-efficacy in science. Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 371-381.
  11. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  12. Midrak, R. L. (2018). What is facial recognition? Lifewire, September 3, https://www.lifewire.com/how-does-a-computer-recognize-your-face-4154178
  13. Mioduser, D., & Betzer, N. (2008). The contribution of project-based-learning to high-achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 18(1), 59-77. https://doi-org.ezproxy.bgu.ac.il/10.1007/s10798-006-9010-4.
  14. Molins-Ruano, P., Gonzalez-Sacristan, C., & Garcia-Saura, C. (2018). Phogo: A low-cost, free and “maker” revisit to Logo. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 428-440.
  15. Nordgren, R. D. (2002). Globalization and education: what students will need to know and be able to do in the global village. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(4), 318-321.
  16. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030 https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
  17. Savery J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1):9-20.
  18. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
  19. Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. Tech Trends, 60(6), 565-568. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7.

Globalization & Business European University European University European University mes.gov.ge erih plus mes.gov.ge EBSCO index copernicus Google Scholar Open Academic Journals Index Scientific Indexing Services International Scientific Indexing Daugavpils University